Case 6023103/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Leetent Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023103/2024
- Decision date
- 16 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Mr P J Foster, brought a complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 alleging unlawful deductions from wages by the Respondent, Leetent Ltd. The Respondent did not enter a Response, did not appear and was not represented, and the Tribunal proceeded in its absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Claimant gave sworn evidence and produced his employment contracts, pay slips and bank statements.
On jurisdiction, although the Claimant lived and worked in the Isle of Man, both contracts of employment contained identical clauses providing that the governing law and exclusive jurisdiction were those of England and Wales. The Tribunal applied Rule 8 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and was satisfied that the Respondent resides or carries on business in England, being registered at Companies House with a London registered address. The claim was presented on 24 December 2024, within the three-month primary time limit running from termination on 31 October 2024.
On the merits, the Tribunal was satisfied on the evidence of the Claimant's contractual entitlement and that he had not been paid his salary for September and October 2024, his contractual six months' notice pay, or his holiday pay, and that the Respondent had failed to account for his income tax and national insurance for April to August 2024 inclusive. The Tribunal accepted that the Claimant treated himself as discharged from interim payment plans agreed in October and November 2024 owing to the Respondent's repudiatory breaches and reverted to his full contractual entitlement. The complaint was found well-founded and the Respondent was ordered to pay £96,731.00 gross, the Claimant undertaking to account to the Isle of Man tax authorities.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Section 23 ERA 1996 claim covering unpaid September and October 2024 salary (£20,000), 16 days untaken holiday pay (£7,455.35), six months contractual notice pay (£60,000) and 5 months of tax and NI deducted but not paid onwards (£9,275.65). Heard in the Respondent's absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. All sums ordered gross. | Upheld | — | £96,731 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £96,731
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 8 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.