Case 6023176/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Saeid Aminifard v Commercial Maintenance Services UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023176/2025
- Decision date
- 24 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gould Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Saeid Aminifard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Newcastle by CVP before Employment Judge Gould on 24 November 2025, considered four complaints brought by Mr Aminifard against Commercial Maintenance Services UK Limited. Two unlawful deduction from wages complaints were dismissed: the unpaid overtime complaint for the period 21 October 2024 to 31 March 2025 was found not to be well founded, and the complaint regarding a £95.00 parking fine deducted on 31 January 2025 was found to have been presented out of time, with the Tribunal finding it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time.
The complaint of unlawful deduction in respect of one day of annual leave taken on 13 January 2025 and deducted on 28 February 2025 was well-founded, but no compensation was ordered because the Respondent had already paid the Claimant £126.92 on 31 March 2025 as accrued but untaken holiday pay at the date employment terminated.
The breach of contract complaint relating to notice pay was well-founded. The Respondent was ordered to pay £1,903.84 as damages, calculated on a gross basis to reflect the likelihood that the Claimant would have to pay tax on the sum as Post Employment Notice Pay.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unlawful deduction from wages for unpaid overtime in the period 21 October 2024 to 31 March 2025 was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint regarding a £95.00 parking fine deducted on 31 January 2025 was not presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present in time, and the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unlawful deduction of one day of annual leave taken on 13 January 2025 (deducted from pay on 28 February 2025) was well-founded. No compensation was ordered because the Respondent had already paid the Claimant £126.92 on 31 March 2025 for the accrued but untaken holiday at termination. | Upheld | — | £0 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay was well-founded; the Respondent was ordered to pay £1,903.84 as damages, calculated using gross pay to reflect likely tax on Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £1,903 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,903
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.