Case 6023194/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Coates v Kimura Management Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023194/2024
- Decision date
- 26 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Coates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 13 August 2025, Employment Judge Emery sitting alone at London Central by CVP found that Mr P Coates was an employee of Kimura Management Services Ltd from 1 October 2023 until termination of employment on 29 November 2024. The tribunal held that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded and found that the claimant was owed two months' notice pay. Damages for that claim were assessed at £25,000, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that tax would be payable as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal also held that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to a redundancy consultation process was well-founded. Damages for that breach were assessed at £12,500, again calculated using gross pay for the same tax-related reason.
In addition, the tribunal held that the holiday pay complaint was well-founded. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the employment ended. The award for that claim was £2,307.69, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance. The total sum due was recorded as £39,807.69.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint in relation to notice pay; tribunal found two months' notice pay was owed. Damages were calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax being due as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint in relation to a redundancy consultation process; tribunal found this breach of contract claim well-founded. Damages were calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax being due as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £12,500 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of holiday pay; tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because holiday accrued but untaken at termination was not paid. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £39,808
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.