Case 6023211/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Camelia Mariana Istodor v CMC Corporation Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023211/2025
- Decision date
- 22 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Camelia Mariana Istodor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 22 June 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,802.21 gross. The tribunal also found the respondent in breach of contract in respect of unpaid expenses and ordered damages of £192.97.
In total, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,995.18.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; ordered respondent to pay £1802.21 gross. Rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £1,802 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of unpaid expenses; damages of £192.97 awarded. Rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £193 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,995
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.