Case 6023223/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Power v QStory Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023223/2024
- Decision date
- 11 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Power
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brown struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on whether strike out should follow because he had not complied with the Order of EJ Bunting dated 12 March 2024 and because the claim was not being actively pursued. The order required the claimant to identify, in relation to each allegation in paragraph 5 of his document, whether and where it appeared in the ET1 of 26 December 2025 and in the letter to EJ Keogh dated 26 December 2024.
The claimant replied on 28 April 2025 and again on 19 May 2025, but on each occasion he only said that he was waiting for the outcome of a complaint he had made about the Tribunal and that he was appealing the proposal to strike out. He gave no details or reasons why the claim should not be struck out, and he did not say that he would comply with EJ Bunting's order.
On 13 May 2025 the respondent informed the Tribunal that the claimant had also failed to provide details of the alleged disability of depression and relevant medical records required by paragraphs 21 and 22 of EJ Bunting's order by 2 May 2025. The Tribunal found that the claimant was in breach of the Tribunal's orders, had shown no intention of complying with them, was not actively pursuing the claim, and had given no satisfactory reason why the claim should not be struck out.
The judgment therefore records that the claim was struck out. No monetary remedy was awarded or assessed in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify this claim separately, but the case was listed as including unfair dismissal and the entire claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment refers to the claimant's alleged disability of depression in the context of non-compliance with an earlier order, but does not determine the claim on the merits. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.