Case 6023246/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Gray v Generis Enterprise Technology Limited and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023246/2025
- Decision date
- 26 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Gray
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Gray complained of unfair dismissal against Generis Enterprise Technology Limited and Camino Partners Limited. Employment Judge E Burns held that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required at least two years' service in order to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and found that the claimant had been employed for less than two years.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that Mr Gray was not entitled to bring the unfair dismissal complaint and struck it out. The judgment records no remedy because the claim did not proceed to determination on the merits.
The judgment also states that the claimant’s other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and found the claimant had been employed for less than two years. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.