Case 6023294/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Shaun Garbett v Euro Foods Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023294/2024
- Decision date
- 28 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smart
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Shaun Garbett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 13 August 2025, Employment Judge Smart warned the claimant that the tribunal was considering dismissing the claim under rule 47 or striking it out under rule 38. The claimant was given until 18 August 2025 to object or make representations, but he did not do so and did not otherwise communicate with the tribunal.
The judgment states that the claim is dismissed pursuant to rule 47 for the reasons previously given by Employment Judge Smart. In the alternative, the tribunal recorded that it would have struck out the claim under rule 38 for the same reasons and because the claimant failed actively to pursue the claim. The hearing listed for 4 November 2025 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the claim as a whole and does not separate findings by cause of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claim as a whole and does not separate findings by cause of action. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the claim as a whole and does not separate findings by cause of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47
- rule 38
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.