Case 6023417/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Fazakerley First v Flower Operations Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023417/2024
- Decision date
- 7 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Fazakerley First
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the case was heard in public by CVP at Manchester on 7 November 2025 before Employment Judge Anderson sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr White, Director.
The judgment states that, in accordance with Rule 21(5) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, the judgment sent to the parties on 18 September 2025 is set aside. The written record does not include reasons, findings on the underlying claims, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment sets aside the Rule 21 judgment sent to the parties on 18 September 2025. It does not determine the underlying unlawful deduction from wages claim or record a remedy. | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The short judgment sets aside the Rule 21 judgment sent to the parties on 18 September 2025. It does not determine the underlying Working Time Regulations claim or record a remedy. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21(5) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.