Case 6023422/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Stange v Custom Climates Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023422/2025
- Decision date
- 28 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Stange
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at London South by CVP on 21 October 2025 before Employment Judge Harrington. The tribunal found that the complaint in respect of holiday pay was well-founded. It held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date his employment ended.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £413.44. It also stated that the claimant is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance on that sum.
A separate complaint that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars was dismissed. The tribunal found that the respondent did provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £413 |
| Other | The complaint about providing a written statement of employment particulars was not well-founded because the tribunal found the respondent had provided one. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £413
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.