Case 6023451/2024 · Employment Tribunal
J Harrison v MCB Fabrications Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023451/2024
- Decision date
- 9 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J Harrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 1 May 2025, the Tribunal told the claimant that it was considering striking out the claim because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 26 February 2025, despite a reminder on 9 April 2025, and/or because the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on that issue.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 12 May 2025 did not go ahead. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any substantive determination of the underlying claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not restate the underlying pleaded claim; this classification is taken from the gov.uk listing for the decision. The claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.