Case 6023792/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Richard Errington v Quad Recruitment Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6023792/2025
- Decision date
- 7 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Richard Errington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Richard Errington's claim against Quad Recruitment Ltd. The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action or determine its merits.
The Tribunal had written to Mr Errington on 23 February 2026 warning that it was considering strike-out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because he had not complied with Tribunal orders dated 13 October 2025 and 4 February 2026 and the claim had not been actively pursued. He was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but did not reply. Employment Judge Sharp was satisfied that the Rule 38 grounds applied and that strike-out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. No remedy was awarded or addressed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.