Case 6023886/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Philbey v Aston Services Group Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6023886/2025
- Decision date
- 19 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Philbey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 14 January 2026, to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 13 October 2025 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The short judgment states only that the claim is struck out. The discrimination-age classification is based on the listing category provided in the prompt; the judgment text itself does not set out claim particulars. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The short judgment states only that the claim is struck out. The discrimination-disability classification is based on the listing category provided in the prompt; the judgment text itself does not set out claim particulars. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.