Case 6024406/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Maidens v GI Media Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6024406/2025
- Decision date
- 29 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Maidens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to GI Media Group Ltd. It found that the claimant's claim of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded and succeeded.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £450.00 gross by 4:00pm on Monday 20 October 2025. The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment contrary to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, but decided that exceptional circumstances meant no award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 should be made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the unauthorised deduction from wages claim was well-founded and succeeds, with a gross award of £450.00. | Upheld | — | £450 |
| Other | The respondent failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions contrary to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, but the tribunal found exceptional circumstances meant no section 38 award should be made. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £450
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.