Case 6024559/2025 · Employment Tribunal
no appearance For the v Marina Kitchen — 2026
- Case reference
- 6024559/2025
- Decision date
- 23 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
no appearance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed at Manchester on 23 April 2026 for a preliminary case management hearing to clarify the complaints and give directions. The claimant had ticked boxes on the ET1 indicating complaints of race discrimination and arrears of pay. The judgment records that he gave his employment dates as 18 to 23 March 2025 as a kitchen assistant, and alleged that a manager used racist language towards him and assaulted him on 23 March 2025. The ET3 response took issue with his account and made counter-allegations.
The claimant did not attend the hearing. The tribunal was satisfied that he would have been aware of it because notice had been sent on 5 September 2025 to the legal representative then on record. His former representative later emailed on 7 April 2026 saying she no longer represented him and provided an email address for direct correspondence. No completed Case Management Agenda or other documents had been received from the claimant.
The start of the hearing was delayed while the tribunal clerk tried to contact the claimant by email, as no telephone number had been provided, but there was no reply. Employment Judge Kenward considered making directions in the claimant's absence, adjourning, or dismissing the claim. Applying rule 47 and the overriding objective, the judge dismissed the claim because further directions or an adjournment were likely to involve further delay and tribunal resources where there was no meaningful indication that the claimant was still actively pursuing the matter. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination complaint was dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing; the merits were not determined. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The arrears of pay complaint was dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing; the merits were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in rule 3 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.