Case 6024582/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Pruzhanskaya v Flex Legal Limited R1 Maitland Walker LLP R2 Mischon de Reya R3 Adrian Render R4 Joseph Siman R5 Julian Maitland-Walker R6 Mary Bonsor R7 — 2025
- Case reference
- 6024582/2025
- Decision date
- 6 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Pruzhanskaya
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 6 August 2025, to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The Tribunal recorded that it appeared a fair hearing was no longer possible because the claim was scandalous or vexatious, had no reasonable prospect of success, and was an abuse of process.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal concluded that a fair hearing was not possible and struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment text refers only to the claim being struck out; claim type is based on the supplied Public Interest Disclosure listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.