Case 6024701/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Ekpechi v Apcoa UK — 2025
- Case reference
- 6024701/2025
- Decision date
- 8 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Ekpechi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied for interim relief against APCOA UK. The hearing took place remotely by CVP at London South on 31 July 2025 before Employment Judge Heath.
The judgment states that the claimant's application for interim relief brought under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was refused. The written record does not give reasons, noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days.
No monetary award or continuation order is recorded in the judgment, and the underlying substantive complaint is not identified in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only records dismissal of an application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It does not identify the underlying substantive claim in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.