Case 6024726/2025 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 6024726/2025
- Decision date
- 11 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey’s
Parties
1 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Brazier brought claims against Entangled Positions Ltd for unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. The respondent did not submit an accepted response and did not attend the hearing. Its late draft response did not dispute the claimant's employment dates or pay details and did not identify which parts of the claims were contested. The tribunal therefore found no reason or evidential basis not to accept the claimant's account.
The tribunal accepted that Mr Brazier was employed from 14 March 2022 until 20 June 2025. He was not paid from October 2023, apart from a payment in August 2024 covering the salary owed for October 2023, and resigned in June 2025 in response to the persistent failure to pay his salary. The tribunal held that this was an express breach of contract entitling him to resign and upheld his claim of constructive unfair dismissal. Although he indicated that he was seeking only the unpaid wages, the tribunal awarded the automatically applicable basic award of £1,372.80, calculated as 3 × 1 × £457.60.
For unlawful deduction from wages, the tribunal accepted the claimant's stated pay of £457.60 per week and £1,830.40 per month and upheld the claim. It awarded £41,536 gross for unpaid wages. The judgment did not state a combined total award or record a compensatory award or interest.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The formal judgment describes the claim as unfair dismissal; the reasons specify that the upheld claim was constructive unfair dismissal arising from resignation following persistent non-payment of salary. | Upheld | — | £1,373 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was stated as £41,536 gross. | Upheld | — | £41,536 |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.