Case 6025427/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jake Plant v Thao One Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6025427/2025
- Decision date
- 5 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barrett Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jake Plant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the East London Employment Tribunal on 8 July 2025 following early conciliation between 2 May and 12 June 2025. The Respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Tribunal determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The Respondent did not attend and was not represented; the Claimant represented himself.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages in the period of 1 to 30 April 2025 and ordered payment of £4,883 (the gross sum deducted). The Tribunal further found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,060 gross. The Claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance.
In total, the Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £5,643.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 1 to 30 April 2025; gross sum deducted ordered to be paid. | Upheld | — | £4,883 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay Claimant's holiday entitlement; gross amount ordered. | Upheld | — | £1,060 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,643
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.