Case 6025656/2025 · Employment Tribunal

Mr Noman Naseer v Hyperlabour Limited (In creditors voluntary liquidation) c/o practitioners Rehan Ahmed and Jeremy Woodside and 1 other — 2026

Case reference: 6025656/2025
Decision date: 10 July 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Beever
Venue: By CVP

Indexed: 28 July 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mr Noman Naseer

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal held that Mr Noman Naseer's claim for a payment from the Secretary of State for Business and Trade under section 182 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and succeeded. Pursuant to section 188(3)(b), it declared that the Secretary of State ought to pay £3,261.90.

The payment comprised net arrears of pay of £2,163.00 for 7.5 weeks at £12.21 per hour and 40 hours per week, after taking account of a £1,500 part payment from the liquidators; notice pay of £488.40 for one week; and holiday pay of £610.50 for 1.25 weeks of holiday taken but unpaid.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Claim for a payment from the Secretary of State under section 182 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The declared payment comprised £2,163.00 in arrears of pay, £488.40 in notice pay and £610.50 in holiday pay.	Upheld	—	£3,262

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £3,262; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.