Case 6025751/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Rama First v Second Respondent: Teeside Healthcare Ltd - Churchview Nursing and Residential Home Bharathi Panjadka — 2026
- Case reference
- 6025751/2025
- Decision date
- 12 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Rama First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant's application for interim relief, pursuant to section 129 Employment Rights Act 1996, succeeded. The written judgment does not include written reasons, noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The respondent stated that it was willing to re-engage the claimant at its Cherrytree care home in the same role and on the same terms and conditions as before dismissal. The claimant agreed to that re-engagement, and the Tribunal ordered re-engagement on those terms with pay and other benefits backdated to the date of termination and paid immediately.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claimant's application for interim relief under section 129 Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeds. It does not set out the underlying substantive claim or written reasons. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 129 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.