Case 6025807/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Onyinye Ndukwe v NHS Cambridge — 2026
- Case reference
- 6025807/2025
- Decision date
- 27 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Onyinye Ndukwe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn Onyinye Ndukwe's claim against NHs Cambridge, the tribunal found that the claimant's responses of 2 November 2025 raised no issues of pregnancy/maternity discrimination, marital status discrimination, religion or belief discrimination, or whistleblowing. These matters had been indicated on the ET1 form.
On that basis, Employment Judge Cowen concluded that the claim showed no reasonable prospect of success and dismissed it. The judgment was approved on 27 July 2026 and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The judgment describes this as marital status discrimination. | Dismissed | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Whistleblowing | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- No reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.