Case 6025878/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Broad v Sansum Solutions Group Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6025878/2025
- Decision date
- 10 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Broad
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Moor upheld Mr G Broad’s unfair dismissal complaint and breach of contract claim for dismissal without notice against Sansum Solutions Group Limited. Mr Broad represented himself at the video hearing on 12 May 2026; the respondent did not attend. The accrued but untaken holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal because the amount had been paid. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The calculation recorded gross monthly pay of £3,510 and net monthly pay of £2,832.48. For the basic award, a week’s pay was capped at £700. The tribunal calculated four times 1.5 times £700, producing £4,200, then applied a 20% uplift to reach £5,040.
Past earnings loss comprised £4,842.38 for full loss from 26 June to 18 August, £2,760.94 for partial loss from 19 August 2025 to 18 January 2026, and £941.64 for partial loss from 19 January to 12 May 2026. The partial-loss calculations used the reduced salary Mr Broad would have received had he remained employed, with annual net pay of £30,246, against net earnings from subsequent work. Total past loss was £8,544.96, increased to £10,253.95 by a 20% uplift.
Future earnings loss used an annual net shortfall of £2,246.40, calculated at 60% through to pension age on 8 July 2028. Including a 20% uplift, this produced £3,487.40. Lost employer pension contributions were calculated up to the second job, after which the loss was described as de minimis. That component was £779.14 after a 20% uplift.
The compensatory award totalled £14,520.49. Together with the £5,040 basic award, the respondent was ordered to pay £19,560.49. No additional notice damages were awarded because earnings loss for the same period already covered them. Recoupment did not apply because Mr Broad had not claimed relevant benefits.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The award comprises a basic award of £5,040 and a compensatory award of £14,520.49, including the stated 20% uplifts. | Upheld | — | £19,560 |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal because the accrued but untaken holiday pay had been paid. The amount paid is not stated. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim concerned dismissal without notice. Notice damages were included in the loss of earnings awarded for the same period, with no separate amount identified and no additional award to avoid double-counting. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,560
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,040
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £14,520
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.