Case 6026084/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 6026084/2025
- Decision date
- 11 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Martin found Mr H Tallentire's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages well founded against H & P Hospitality (Piercebridge) Limited. The first respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £3,000 net.
The claim against Rebecca Powell, the second respondent, was dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the hearing; the written judgment records no further factual findings or legal tests.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint was well founded against H & P Hospitality (Piercebridge) Limited, the first respondent. The award was stated to be net. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim against Rebecca Powell, the second respondent, was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.