Case 6026186/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Sbfm — 2026
- Case reference
- 6026186/2025
- Decision date
- 8 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge On
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim concerning payment or salary, saying that she had problems at the respondent, that her hours had been reduced and later agreed to be reinstated, and that she had not been paid everything she thought she was owed after leaving.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant had been asked before the hearing to set out the amounts she said were owed and why, but had not done so. At the hearing she said she thought she was owed £1,400 and that she had been paid that amount.
On that basis, the Tribunal found the unauthorised deductions from wages claim was not well-founded and dismissed it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the claim as unauthorised deductions from wages and records that the claimant said she thought she was owed £1,400 and had been paid that amount. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.