Case 6026301/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Cole v Butterfly Bloom Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6026301/2025
- Decision date
- 4 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Cole
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the East London Employment Tribunal on 15 July 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Mrs L Cole was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, it held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £723.58. The extracted judgment does not set out any separate award calculation or any additional substantive findings beyond the redundancy payment.
The hearing listed for 1 December 2025 was cancelled. The judgment was approved by Regional Employment Judge Burgher on 4 December 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £723.58. No separate award breakdown is given in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £724 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £724
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.