Case 6026346/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Muhammadniyor Qahhorov v Z Yaremcha Builders Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6026346/2025
- Decision date
- 3 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Muhammadniyor Qahhorov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 15 July 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The only substantive finding recorded was that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal ordered Z Yaremecha Builders Ltd to pay Muhammadniyor Qahhorov £1,190 gross. It also stated that, to the extent part of the sum had been properly accounted for and paid to HMRC, for example under the Construction Industry Scheme, payment of the net amount due would be a valid discharge of the judgment to that extent if properly documented. The hearing listed for 29 January 2026 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,190 gross. It noted that, where some of the amount due had been properly accounted for and paid to HMRC, for example under the Construction Industry Scheme, payment of the net amount due would be a valid discharge to that extent if properly documented. | Upheld | — | £1,190 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,190
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.