Case 6026810/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R J Cassidy v Round Financial Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6026810/2025
- Decision date
- 18 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R J Cassidy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent was ordered to pay damages of £13,845.20 gross, and the tribunal stated that it did not have jurisdiction to order interest on the unpaid sum prior to the issue date of the judgment.
The judgment states that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. The hearing listed for 16 March 2026 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £13,845.20 gross. It also states that remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing, so any further remedy is not extracted. | Upheld | — | £13,845 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,845
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.