Case 6027014/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Muhammad Rauf v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6027014/2025
- Decision date
- 5 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Muhammad Rauf
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge George struck out Mr Muhammad Rauf's claim against Royal Mail International under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The hearing took place in public by CVP at Reading Employment Tribunal on 4 August 2026. Mr Rauf represented himself, and Mr L Millington, solicitor, represented the respondent.
The judgment was approved on 5 August 2026. Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written judgment does not identify the claim's legal basis or set out the underlying facts and reasoning. It records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the claim's legal basis. The listing's whistleblowing hint cannot be verified from the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024: no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.