Case 6027129/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Stivrins v Resale Office Furniture New & Used Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6027129/2025
- Decision date
- 21 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Stivrins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented at the London East Employment Tribunal on 21 July 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination of the claim could properly be made in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,562.00 gross, with the total sum payable also stated as £2,562.00. The hearing previously listed for 26 January 2026 was cancelled.
The judgment was approved by Regional Employment Judge Burgher and dated 23 January 2026. The judgment does not split the award between components or refer to interest, basic award or compensatory award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21/22 default judgment: respondent failed to present a valid response on time and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. | Upheld | — | £2,562 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,562
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.