Case 6027468/2025 · Employment Tribunal
MR JUNIOR CHAMBERLAIN v Birmingham Busworks Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6027468/2025
- Decision date
- 16 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N. Clarke Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR JUNIOR CHAMBERLAIN
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 16 March 2026 before Employment Judge N. Clarke, MR JUNIOR CHAMBERLAIN appeared in person and Birmingham Busworks Limited (in voluntary liquidation) did not appear. The tribunal found the claim of unauthorised deduction of wages well-founded and held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the sum of £1,458, payable net of tax and National Insurance.
The judgment records that all other claims were dismissed on withdrawal. No separate reasons are given in the order for those withdrawn claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed on withdrawal; this claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than named in the order. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in the sum of £1,458 and ordered payment of that amount net of tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,458 |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed on withdrawal; this claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than named in the order. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,458
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.