Case 6027535/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Rhiannon Ivens v Welsh Ministers — 2026
- Case reference
- 6027535/2025
- Decision date
- 26 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S. Evans Authorised
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Rhiannon Ivens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal stated that it had no jurisdiction to deal with Rhiannon Ivens's claims against the Welsh Ministers alleging breach of data protection provisions, breach of confidentiality and breach of duty. Those claims were dismissed upon their withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment did not determine the claimant's other complaints, which were made the subject of Case Management Orders promulgated separately. No monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim alleging breach of data protection provisions; the Tribunal stated that it had no jurisdiction to deal with the claim and dismissed it upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim alleging breach of confidentiality; the Tribunal stated that it had no jurisdiction to deal with the claim and dismissed it upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim alleging breach of duty; the Tribunal stated that it had no jurisdiction to deal with the claim and dismissed it upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.