Case 6027585/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Tien Mee Kong v Media52 Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6027585/2025
- Decision date
- 19 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Tien Mee Kong
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a default judgment issued under Rule 22 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Respondent, Media52 Ltd, did not present a Response within the relevant time limit, and the Tribunal proceeded to judgment on that basis.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant, Ms Tien Mee Kong, was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,056.00. The hearing previously listed for 19 March 2026 was cancelled.
The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Edmonds on 11 March 2026. No reasons beyond the operative findings were provided in the text available.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Default judgment under Rule 22, Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, the Respondent having failed to present a Response within the relevant time limit. | Upheld | — | £7,056 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,056
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22, Schedule 1 of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.