Case 6027851/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Delaney v Xterior Lifestyle Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6027851/2025
- Decision date
- 4 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Delaney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting as Employment Judge Phil Allen alone under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024, determined that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages during the period from 10 March to 4 July 2025. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £11,965.
As the matter was resolved on the papers, the previously listed hearing on 17 February 2026 was cancelled. The judgment also attaches the standard notice under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, setting out that interest accrues at the stipulated rate of 8% per annum from the day after the relevant decision day (16 March 2026) if the award is not paid within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages between 10 March and 4 July 2025 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £11,965. | Upheld | — | £11,965 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,965
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.