Case 6027889/2025 · Employment Tribunal
N Phillips v Sky Bear Pubs Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6027889/2025
- Decision date
- 10 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningN Phillips presented the claim against Sky Bear Pubs Limited in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 28 July 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Tobin decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in May 2025 and upheld the complaint. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,019.53 gross, which was also the total award. Payment was ordered without deductions for tax, leaving the claimant responsible for any tax liabilities arising from the award.
The accompanying notice states that no interest is payable if the award is paid in full within 14 days after the judgment was sent to the parties on 30 July 2026. Otherwise, interest accrues from 31 July 2026 at 8% per annum. No monetary amount of interest was specified.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award is gross. The claimant is responsible for any tax liabilities arising from it. | Upheld | — | £1,020 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,020
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.