Case 6027914/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Georgina Shotton v Brand Media Marketing Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6027914/2025
- Decision date
- 16 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knight Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Georgina Shotton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Georgina Shotton, brought complaints against Brand Media Marketing Ltd. The complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed following a withdrawal by the Claimant. The remaining complaints proceeded to judgment.
The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded, in that the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages in the period 16 June 2025 to 1 July 2025. The tribunal also found that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £1,273.97 for unauthorised deductions from wages and £594.52 as damages for breach of contract.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages in the period 16 June 2025 to 1 July 2025. | Upheld | — | £1,274 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in relation to notice pay; awarded as damages. | Upheld | — | £595 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,868
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.