Case 6028058/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Osagiede v London Borough of Hounslow — 2025
- Case reference
- 6028058/2025
- Decision date
- 24 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Osagiede
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant did not attend the hearing on 24 October 2025. It also recorded that the claimant did not provide any written representations under Rule 42.
The judgment states that the claimant's claim is dismissed under Rule 42. The written record does not contain substantive findings on the underlying unfair dismissal or public interest disclosure allegations, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The short Rule 42 judgment dismisses the claim after the claimant did not attend the hearing and did not provide written representations. The written record does not provide separate reasons for this claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The short Rule 42 judgment dismisses the claim after the claimant did not attend the hearing and did not provide written representations. The written record does not provide separate reasons for this claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 42
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.