Case 6028194/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Emeka Agina v Garden Care Home — 2025
- Case reference
- 6028194/2025
- Decision date
- 10 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Emeka Agina
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 30 July 2025. The respondent, Garden Care Home, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £18 gross. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax or employee national insurance contributions.
No separate award was identified beyond the £18 gross sum, and the hearing listed for 14 November 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge made a determination under rule 22 and found unauthorised deductions from wages in the sum of £18 gross. | Upheld | — | £18 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.