Case 6029237/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Bunting v Norfabs Limited AT A HEARING — 2026
- Case reference
- 6029237/2025
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Bunting
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr Paul Bunting was dismissed without notice by reason of redundancy on 15 July 2025. Norfabs Limited did not enter an appearance and did not attend the CVP hearing before Employment Judge Lancaster at Leeds on 29 April 2026.
The redundancy payment claim succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay £7,190.00, calculated by reference to one week's pay, capped at £719.00, for each continuous year of employment. The extracted text gives dates for continuous employment that are internally unclear, but the amount awarded is stated in the judgment.
The wrongful dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal awarded £1,440.00 as pay in lieu of notice, covering two weeks from 15 July 2025 until the claimant commenced alternative employment in mitigation of loss, at £720.00 gross per week based on 40 hours at £18.00 per hour.
The tribunal found a series of unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 2 June to 15 July 2025 and awarded £3,396.45, comprising statutory sick pay amounts and unpaid wages. It also found breach of contract because employee pension contributions deducted from wages for the 13-week period from 17 November 2024 to 16 February 2025 had not been paid to the pension provider, and awarded £374.40. The holiday pay claim was dismissed because the claimant had taken two weeks' leave plus bank holidays and had no outstanding accrued holiday entitlement. The total of the monetary awards recorded is £12,400.85.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records a redundancy payment calculated at one week's pay, capped at £719.00, for each continuous year of employment, producing £7,190.00. The extracted text states employment from 1 October 2014 to 15 July 2015, which appears internally inconsistent with the 15 July 2025 dismissal date and the amount awarded. | Upheld | — | £7,190 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as damages for wrongful dismissal, described as pay in lieu of notice from 15 July 2025 until commencement of alternative employment in mitigation of loss, two weeks at £720.00 per week gross. | Upheld | — | £1,440 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found a series of unauthorised deductions from wages for 2 June to 15 July 2025, including admitted statutory sick pay entitlement and unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £3,396 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment found breach of contract at termination because employee pension contributions deducted from wages for 17 November 2024 to 16 February 2025 had not been paid over to the pension provider. | Upheld | — | £374 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the claimant had taken two weeks' leave plus bank holidays, leaving no outstanding accrued holiday entitlement in the leave year from 1 January 2025; the extracted text says 2205, which is treated as a text extraction error. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,401
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.