Case 6029585/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M. Randall v Global Lifecycle Solutions Emea Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6029585/2025
- Decision date
- 18 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Massarella Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M. Randall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the Respondent conceded it had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages between February and July 2025. By consent, the Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the net sum of £26,665.29 without any deductions, with the Respondent liable for any tax and national insurance on the sum.
The Tribunal further held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear claims relating to an employer's failure to make pension contributions, and that claim was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not provided absent a request within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent conceded unauthorised deductions from wages between February and July 2025; sum ordered by consent. | Upheld | — | £26,665 |
| Other | Claim relating to employer's failure to make pension contributions dismissed for lack of tribunal jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,665
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.