Case 6029970/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Kan Seng Law v Good Law International Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6029970/2025
- Decision date
- 21 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
- Venue
- London South ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kan Seng Law
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge G. King heard the case at London South Employment Tribunal on 21 January 2026. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Mr A. Elmarakby as lay representative. The tribunal determined four claims: a breach of contract claim concerning a loan agreement, a holiday pay claim, a breach of contract claim concerning payment for a Practising Certificate, and a breach of contract claim concerning notice pay.
The loan-agreement breach of contract claim was held not to be well founded and was dismissed. The remaining three claims succeeded. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £553.84 for unpaid holiday pay (calculated as four days at £138.46 per day), £332.00 for the Practising Certificate, and £3,000.00 for notice pay. The holiday pay and notice pay sums are subject to the usual deductions for tax and National Insurance.
Written reasons were not provided as reasons were given orally at the hearing, with the standard 14-day window for either party to request written reasons noted on the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim of breach of contract in relation to a loan agreement was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay: £553.84 awarded (four days at £138.46 per day), subject to usual deductions for tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £554 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract relating to payment for the Claimant's Practising Certificate: £332.00 awarded. | Upheld | — | £332 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract relating to notice pay: £3,000.00 awarded, subject to usual deductions for tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,886
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.