Case 6030416/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Jimmy Bodiwala v AC Financial Associates Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6030416/2025
- Decision date
- 3 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jimmy Bodiwala
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJimmy Bodiwala presented the claim against AC Financial Associates Ltd on 17 August 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £18,958.31 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,275 in damages, and upheld the claim for unpaid holiday entitlement with an award of £1,822.50. The total ordered was £23,055.81.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was stated to be gross. | Upheld | — | £18,958 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,275 |
| Holiday pay | The award concerned unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,823 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,056
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.