Case 6030488/2025 · Employment Tribunal
D Sexton v Health Assured Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2026
- Case reference
- 6030488/2025
- Decision date
- 6 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D Sexton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held by video platform at Manchester on 6 May 2026, Employment Judge Batten sat alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by A Farooq, consultant.
The tribunal's judgment was that the claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success. No remedy was awarded or recorded in the written judgment.
The written judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties. The written record does not set out the factual basis of the claim or the tribunal's detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success. The written judgment does not set out the substance of the breach of contract claim; classification follows the supplied gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.