Case 6030722/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Spencer v The Baytree Welshpool Ltd. HELD AT: Welshpool — 2026
- Case reference
- 6030722/2025
- Decision date
- 9 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Spencer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge T Vincent Ryan, sitting alone in Welshpool with the respondent absent (no response entered), found in favour of the claimant on all heads of claim. The claimant was found to have been unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy on 20 June 2025 after 11 complete years of employment.
The tribunal awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £6,127.62, damages for breach of contract for notice (11 weeks' pay at average £395.33 = £4,348.63), £237.50 for unauthorised deductions (two weeks' sick pay), £679.12 holiday pay (55.62 hours at £12.21), and £790.66 (two weeks' wages) for failure to provide written employment particulars. The total award is £12,183.53, with sums subject to the usual statutory deductions for tax and National Insurance where indicated.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal by reason of redundancy on 20 June 2025. No basic/compensatory award split given in the judgment - awards listed are redundancy payment, notice damages, unauthorised deductions, holiday pay, and s.38 EA 2002 award. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £6,128 |
| Breach of contract | Wrongful dismissal/notice pay: 11 weeks at average weekly wage of £395.33 (claimant had 11 complete years' service). | Upheld | — | £4,349 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Two weeks' sick pay. | Upheld | — | £238 |
| Holiday pay | 55.62 hours at £12.21 per hour. | Upheld | — | £679 |
| Other | Failure to provide written employment particulars - 2 weeks' wages at £395.33. | Upheld | — | £791 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,184
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.