Case 6030824/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Summer-mai Patterson v Tallow Bar and Grill Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6030824/2025
- Decision date
- 20 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Summer-mai Patterson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Employment Tribunal on 20 August 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Phil Allen determined that a decision could properly be made on the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,833.87. The hearing previously listed for 13 March 2026 was cancelled.
A separate notice was issued under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, recording 5 March 2026 as the relevant decision day, 6 March 2026 as the calculation day, and 8% per annum as the stipulated rate of interest applicable if the award is not paid within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 determination made after the respondent failed to present a valid response in time. | Upheld | — | £1,834 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,834
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.