Case 6030950/2025 · Employment Tribunal
A Neves dos Ramos Abel v The Good Kind Café Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6030950/2025
- Decision date
- 8 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Neves dos Ramos Abel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningA Neves dos Ramos Abel presented the claim against The Good Kind Café Ltd in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 21 August 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Eeley decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered it to pay £250 gross. The judgment was approved on 8 June 2026 and sent to the parties on 4 August 2026. The accompanying notice states that interest accrues from 5 August 2026 at 8% per annum, but no interest is payable if the award is paid in full within 14 days after the judgment was sent. No monetary amount for interest was specified.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award is £250 gross. | Upheld | — | £250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £250
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
- Section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.