Case 6030959/2025 · Employment Tribunal

Mr A Modi v Redcloud Technologies Limited Certificate of Correction Under — 2025

Case reference: 6030959/2025
Decision date: 25 November 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge E Burns

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Modi

Respondent

Redcloud Technologies Limited Certificate of Correction Under

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The supplied document is a certificate of correction under Rule 67 in the case of Mr A Modi v Redcloud Technologies Limited. It states that the judgment and written reasons sent to the parties on 25 November 2025 were corrected, and that the only change was to the case number, which had previously been incorrect.

No substantive tribunal reasoning, claim outcome, legal test, or remedy figure is set out in the extracted text. The certificate also records that the correction was approved by Employment Judge E Burns on 28 November 2025 and sent to the parties on 2 December 2025. It further notes that the time limits for reasons, reconsideration, or appeal are unaffected by the certificate and continue to run from the date the original judgment or reasons were sent.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The supplied text is a certificate of correction under Rule 67. It states that the judgment and written reasons sent on 25 November 2025 were corrected only to change the case number. No substantive adjudicated claim, finding, or outcome appears in the extracted text.	Other	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.