Case 6031055/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Nisha Rabail v Advance Secured Solutions Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6031055/2025
- Decision date
- 2 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge I Comfort Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Nisha Rabail
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a claim by Ms Nisha Rabail against Advance Secured Solutions Ltd at the East London Hearing Centre on 2 February 2026 before Employment Judge I Comfort. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Summaya Mustafa.
The tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded and succeeded, and ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £10,878.79. It further found that the complaint of unpaid annual leave (holiday pay) was well-founded and succeeded, and ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £1,301.00.
The total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant was recorded as £12,179.79. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not provided in this record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the net sum of £10,878.79 for unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £10,879 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the net sum of £1,301.00 for unpaid annual leave. | Upheld | — | £1,301 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,180
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.