Case 6031267/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Misss E Mason v The Train Line (NE) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6031267/2025
- Decision date
- 24 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Misss E Mason
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 24 August 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Shepherd decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross amount of £1,086.69. It also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross amount of £3,783.68.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and must pay the gross amount of £1,086.69. | Upheld | — | £1,087 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and must pay the gross amount of £3,783.68. | Upheld | — | £3,784 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,870
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.