Case 6031759/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Gardner v Iemcs Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6031759/2025
- Decision date
- 1 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Gardner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found Mrs K Gardner's complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded and held that she had been unfairly dismissed by IEMCS Ltd. Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing, but the written judgment does not record the factual findings or reasoning underlying that conclusion.
The respondent was ordered to pay a compensatory award of £9,000, stated to be the actual sum payable after any deductions or uplifts. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 apply. The judgment records a prescribed element of £8,400 for the period from 24 June 2025 to 1 April 2026 and a £600 difference between the total award and the prescribed element.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found the complaint well-founded and awarded £9,000 as compensation. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 apply. | Upheld | — | £9,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,000
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.