Case 6031803/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Levy v Otcco Limited t/a Forge Accountancy (In creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6031803/2025
- Decision date
- 21 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Havard Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Levy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Cardiff via CVP on 21 November 2025, before Employment Judge R Havard, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent made no appearance. The tribunal recorded that the claims were for notice pay, holiday pay and unpaid wages.
The tribunal held that each of those claims had not been presented within the applicable time limit. It found that it was reasonably practicable to present the claims in time. On that basis, all three claims were dismissed.
The written judgment states that the reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal held it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim dismissed as out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim within time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages dismissed as not presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.